The Norwegian School of Management

The MBA Program, term 2, 2004

Gra 8005 Applied Decision Analyses- Syllabus

Professor Fred Wenstøp

Phone 67 55 72 69 -conference hours by appointment


[Objective][Content][Software][Format][Literature][Grading][Schedule]


Objective

The objective of the course is to supply the participants with the skills necessary to make effective use of formal quantitative analyses. We do not aim at complete mastery of technical details, but rather at developing formal analytic processes that contribute to decision making skills. We focus on the concepts we believe are the most important for the practical analysis of management decisions. Hence, the course is not an overview of management science techniques, but rather an operationalization of fundamental principles.

Content

We discuss the formulation of decision objectives and criteria; the development of alternative strategies; efficient use of marketing surveys and limited information; anticipating competitive reactions; and finally, rational decision making with conflicting objectives.

The course will consist of a combination of theory presentation where the instructor plays the major role, and case discussions where the students play the major role. It is tempting, in Management Science to focus on the mathematical aspects of the various methods. In an MBA-program, however, it is both more relevant and more challenging to discuss their practical applicability. Seemingly, simple methods can become quite sophisticated and useful tools when one is tackling real life problems. We will therefore spend at least the same amount of time on case discussions as on the theory.
Top of page

Software

To use appropriate software is a basic skill for the manager of today. Spreadsheet and statistical analysis packages should therefore be used when it facilitates analysis of the cases. It is not an objective in itself, however, to learn how to use software.

Format

There are several cases. The members of each group work together on the cases and hand in a group solution outline before the case is presented in class. The hand-in should be 2-3 pages and show the rudiments of the assumptions, reasoning and calculations leading to the recommended solution. In most cases, one of the groups will have been appointed to present the case in class, propose a solution, and invite to discussion. The group members organize the presentation among themselves, but each member should participate one way or the other as far as this is practical.

A class meeting normally starts with the instructor introducing the theory that will be relevant for the case to be presented at the next meeting. After this, the appointed group presents the case relating to the previous session's theory. The cases will usually not have a unique solution. This allows for the discussion of alternative analysis methods and practical considerations, which normally is left out in the theory. In this way, we hope to achieve a fruitful synergy between practice and theory.
Top of page

Literature

Handouts
The handouts are partly based on Paul A. Vatter et al.: Quantitative Methods in Management, text and cases, R.D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, Illinois, 1978 (Out of print).

Software
We recommend Excel for Windows as a general tool and host for special applications.
Pro&Con for multi-criteria analysis
 

Recommended literature
P Goodwin and G Wright (1991) Decision Analysis for Management Judgment, John Wiley
R L Keeney (1992) Value focused thinking, Harvard University Press

Top of page

Grading

The final grade is based on:


Schedule, Fall 2004

1. Wednesday, October 20, AM
    Lecture: Emotional rationality. Paper. Overheads. Framework for analysis of decisions under uncertainty
    Recommended reading from G&W : Subjective probability, 278-279; Expected value, 89-90; Decision rules, 98-102; Decision trees, 145-152

 

2. Wednesday, October 27, AM
    Lecture: Risk Aversion, utility functions . Rationality
    Case A: Edgartown Fisheries, presentation: group A, hand-ins: all groups
    Recommended reading from G&W : Limitation of EMV, 102-104; Utility theory, 104-125; Decision tree and utility, 152-154

 

3. Wednesday, November 03, AM
    Lecture: Information, probability distributions
    Case B: Waterman Engineering Corp., presentation: group B, hand-ins: all groups
    Recommended reading from G&W : Probability distributions, 85-89; The value of information, ch. 8

 

4. Wednesday, November 10, AM
    Lecture: Regression Analysis. The lecture is based on Excel data.
    Case C: Monitor Systems, presentation: group C, hand-ins: all groups
    Recommended reading: Any basic text on statistics that include multiple regression analysis

 

5. Wednesday, November 17, AM
    Lecture: Simulation as a tool for decision support. The case solution may be based on a prepared simulation model.
    Case D: Korvettes department stores, presentation: group D, hand-ins: all groups

    Lectured case: The HIV epidemic in New York
    Recommended reading from G&W : Simulation, ch. 7

 

6. Wednesday, November 24, AM
   Quiz, one hour. (An example of a previous quiz can be downloaded.)

   Lecture: Games and competitive reactions
   Case E: Great Western Steel Corp., presentation: group A, hand-ins: all groups

 

7. Wednesday, December 01, AM
    Lectured case: Value based HIV policy in Norway
    Lecture: Value focused thinking
    Case F: Classic Greek Explosives, presentation: group B, hand-ins: all groups

 

8. Wednesday, December 08, AM
    Lecture: Multi Criteria Decision-making
    Value focused decision analysis case: All groups present a decision analysis framework proposal
    (decision context and evaluation criteria). No hand-ins.

 

9. Wednesday, December 15, AM
    Value focused decision analysis case, presentation: groups C and D, hand-ins: all groups

Top of Page